IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Anil Kshetarpal, J.
Jaipal & Ors. – Appellants
Versus
State Of Haryana & Ors. – Respondents
RFA-3149 of 2018 (O&M)
Decided On : 26-04-2022
Fact of the Case:
The landowners filed appeals seeking modification of the award passed by the Reference Court under the Land Acquisition Act. The court considers the notifications, awards, and evidence presented by both parties.Finding of the Court:
The court analyzes the sale exemplars and determines the market value of the acquired land. The court also addresses the arguments made by the counsels for the landowners and the HSIIDC.Ratio Decidendi:
The court modifies the award, re-assessing the market value of the land located on the National Highway and upholding the award for the remaining land. Final Decision: The judgment of the Reference Court is upheld with modifications.JUDGMENT
Anil Kshetarpal, J. - The landowners, while filing appeals under Section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to as 'the 1894 Act') pray for the modification of the award dated 22.02.2017 passed by the Reference Court (hereinafter referred to as 'the RC'). The notification under Section 4, 6 and the awards passed by the Land Acquisition Collector (hereinafter referred to as 'the LAC') as well as by the RC are common. The learned counsels representing the parties are ad-idem that this batch of appeals can be decided by a common judgment.
2. The relevant particulars of the case are as under:-
1.
Notification under Section 4 of the 1894 Act
11.01.2010
For setting up industrial Model Township, Phase-3, Rohtak, to be planned and developed as integrate complex for industrial, transport, Section 30-C, Sector 30-D, Sector 31-C and other utilities in village Kharawar, Tehsil & District Rohtak.
2.
Declaration under Section 4 of the 1894 Act
10.01.2011.
3.
Award No.19, under Section 11 of the 1894 Act.
04.01.2013
Land measuring 2332 kanals 3 Marlas
4
Assessment of the market value
Rs.36,89,900/- per acre.
5.
Assessment by the RC
12.04.2018
All the references were dismissed.
3. For the purpose of describing the potential and location of the land, the pleadings of the landowners, with respect to acquired land located in villages Kheri Sadh, Balyana and Kharawar, being common, are extracted as under:-
"The appellants claim that the acquired land is located near National Highway No.10 Rohtak-Delhi Road, Asthal Bohar and various hotels, banquet halls, Tilyar Lake are adjacent to the acquired land. Various educational institutions, namely, Baba Mast Nath College of Engineering, Eye Hospital, Ayurvedic College, College of Pharmacy, College of Physiotherapy, Shri Baba Mast Nath Residential Public School, Indus Public School, DAV Public School, and DAV Centary Public School, Rohtak, are located nearby. The residential colonies, namely, The Government Employees Cooperative Housing Society Ltd., Sun City Projects and Omex Project, Parsavnath Builder and Sector 27 are also located close by. The acquired land is surrounded by residential colonies and as such the price of the acquired land is not less than Rs. 5 crore per acre. It is also claimed that in village Balyana previously the land has been acquired for setting up Industrial Model Township Phase- 1 and II, where various big industrial concern like Asian Paints, Maruti Testing and Research Central, National Highway NO.71-A and Foodwear Institute have come up. The acquired land is situated within the National Capital Region and falls within the limits of Municipal Corporation, Rohtak. Maharishi Dayanand University and Pandit B.D.Sharma PGIMS, Rohtak, are at a short distance and religious places like Hanuman Mandir, Sainath Temple, Radha Soami Trust are situated near the acquired land."
4. On appreciation of the pleadings, the RC culled out the following issues:-
"(1) What was the market value of the acquired land at the time of issuance of notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894?OPP
(2) Whether the petitioners are entitled to any amount as enhanced compensation as alleged, if so, to what extent?OPP
(3) Whether the present petitions are not maintainable?OPR
(4) Whether the petitioners have got no locus standi to file the present petitions?OPR
(5) Whether the present petition is bad for non-joinder of necessary party and mis-joinder of unnecessary party?OPR
(6) Whether the petitions are barred by limitation, as per the provisions of the Limitation Act, 1963?OPR
(7) Relief."
5. ORAL AND DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE
5. ORAL EVIDENCE PRODUCED BY THE LANDOWNERS
PW1
Neeraj
PW2
Jitender Malik
PW3
Jai Bhagwan, WBM in the office of sub-Registrar, Sampla,
PW4
Yudhvir
PW5
Om Parkash
5.2 DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE PRODUCED BY THE LANDOWNERS (APART FROM THE SALE DEEDS DETAILS WHEREOF ARE GIVEN IN PARA 5.5)
Ex.
Award No.23, dated 20.12.2013 with respect to acquisition of 13 acres 7 kanals a
The court applies the principle of assessing the market value of acquired land based on comparable sale instances and considers the location and development potential of the land.
The court's assessment of market value should be based on direct evidence, such as sale deeds, and should consider the comparability of the evidence presented. The court should not rely on judgments ....
The market value of acquired land should be assessed based on the comparable sale exemplars of the contemporaneous period with respect to the parcels of land, either forming part of the acquired land....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.