Back
VIKAS BAHL
Sunder Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Vikas Bahl, J. (Oral) - This is the second petition for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in FIR No.72 dated 18.05.2021, registered under Section 20-61-85 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (hereinafter to be referred as "the NDPS Act"), Section 25 of the Arms Act, 1959 and Sections 395, 427, 216 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, at Police Station Satnali, District Mahendergarh (District Narnaul).
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the first petition for the grant of regular bail was dismissed as withdrawn on 03.02.2022 on the ground that there were some errors in the petition and in the translation of the FIR and thus, the same was dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh one after making the requisite corrections in translation of the FIR. It is further stated that in fact, the present is the first petition for the grant of regular bail.Brief case of the prosecution is that secret information had been received to the effect that one Canter had been parked near Village Barda and since, there was suspicion that there were some intoxicant substances inside the same, and upon finding the said information to b
The main legal point established is that in cases where the accused's connection to the contraband is not established and there is a delay in trial, the court may grant regular bail, considering the ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the consideration of conscious possession, recovery of commercial quantity, and the applicability of Section 37 of the NDPS Act in granting regular....
The court emphasized the importance of evidence, compliance with legal provisions, and the impact of delay in trial on bail decisions under the NDPS Act.
The judgment highlights the importance of evidence and legal procedures in establishing a defendant's involvement in a criminal case, and the consideration of custody period and legal precedents in g....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the consideration of substantial custody and the admissibility and veracity of disclosure statements in bail applications under the NDPS Act.
Bail can be granted based on the period of custody, arguable points on merits, and satisfaction of the rigors of Section 37(1)(b) of the NDPS Act in similar cases.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the significance of substantial custody, likelihood of trial taking time, and debatable issues in favor of the petitioner in granting regular bail ....
The court emphasized the limitations on granting bail under Section 37 of the NDPS Act, the definition of ganja under Section 2(iii)(b) of the NDPS Act, and the applicability of Section 50 of the NDP....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the consideration of the unlikelihood of carrying contraband in a transparent bag, non-compliance with Section 50 of the Act, and the absence of....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
