SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(P&H) 1167

RAJBIR SEHRAWAT
Jagsir Singh – Appellant
Versus
Ashwani Kumar – Respondent


Advocates:
Mr. Aps Pakka, Advocate, for the Appellant; Mr. Prince Goel, Advocate, for the Respondent.

JUDGMENT

Rajbir Sehrawat, J. (Oral). - This petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for setting aside/quashing the impugned order dated 17.3.2021 (Annexure P-12), passed by the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Bathinda, in Civil Suit No. 677 of 2019, titled as 'Ashwani Kumar v. Jagsir Singh', whereby the defence of the petitioner/defendant has been struck of on account of failure to file written statement within 90 days.

2. It is submitted by counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner had not deliberately avoided the filing of written statement within time. It was only under a bona-fide impression that since the application under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC had been filed and the same was pending, that the written statement could not be filed. However, on the date when the order was passed by the Court, striking of the defence of the petitioner, the petitioner had filed application for placing on record the written statement. That application is already on record of the trial Court, however, the same has not been made part of the case record as such. The counsel has further submitted that the limitation of 90 days is not mandatory. The case has not proceeded

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top