Back
SUDHIR MITTAL
Mehakdeep Kaur – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Sudhir Mittal, J. - This judgment shall decide CWP Nos.19780, 20299 and 20308 of 2021 as common questions of fact and law arise therein. The petitioners in all three cases are school students whose final result of Class-X/Class XII respectively has been quashed by the Board of School Education Haryana- respondent No.4 (hereinafter referred to as the Board) after the same was declared. CWP No.19780 of 2021 has been preferred by students of Class-XII whereas the other two petitions have been preferred by the students of Class-X.
2. Should a Court of law comment on the actions of an Administrator, is one of the questions which arises in this writ petition. In my considered opinion if the Administrator does not exercise his powers judiciously and prudently and the same results in injustice, the Court can certainly comment on the actions, so as to make them aware about the expectations from such Administrators especially when they are dealing with young students who comprise the bulk of the human resource of the nation.
3. The facts in brief as extracted from CWP No.19780 of 2021 are that Haryana Senior Secondary School-respondent No.6 (hereinafter referred to as the private schoo
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the actions of the Board in quashing the students' results were illegal and void, citing violation of Examination Rules and Regulations of the....
The cancellation of exam results for alleged unfair means without direct evidence or proper justification violates procedural fairness and equality rights under the Constitution.
Cancellation of examination results without direct evidence of malpractice violates fundamental rights and lacks legal sustainability.
Exam results cannot be cancelled without direct evidence of unfair means; lack of due process and discrimination in similar treatment of candidates violates principles of justice.
Cancellation of examination results for alleged malpractice requires concrete evidence rather than mere presumption; fairness and due process must be maintained in academic assessments.
The cancellation of examination results based on unproven allegations of unfair means, without substantial evidence, is legally unsustainable and discriminatory, violating principles of fairness in e....
The cancellation of examination results based on presumption without concrete evidence is unsustainable and discriminatory under constitutional law.
Court ruled that the cancellation of examination results based on presumptions without direct evidence violates the principles of equal protection and due process.
Examination results cannot be canceled based on assumptions or without direct evidence; such actions violate principles of fairness and equality.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
