SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(P&H) 1313

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Sant Parkash, J.
Sukhjit Kaur - Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab & Ors. – Respondents
Criminal Writ Petition No.4626 of 2020
Decided On : 05-01-2022

Advocates:
Deepak Aggarwal, Advocate, Tanvir Joshi, Advocate, Rajinder Kumar Singla, Advocate

The welfare of the minor child is the paramount consideration in custody matters, and the court should prioritize the child's best interest over legal rights of the parties involved.

Headnote:

Habeas Corpus - Custody of Minor Child - Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 - Section 7, Section 17 - Gohar Begum v. Suggi alias Nazma Begum and others, 1960 AIR (SC) 93 - Kirtikumar Maheshanker Joshi v. Pradip Kumar Karunashanker Joshi, AIR 1992 Supreme Court 1447

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner sought custody of her minor daughter from her in-laws, who had taken the child after the death of the petitioner's husband. The in-laws alleged that the petitioner was responsible for the husband's death and had abandoned the child.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the custody of the minor child was not illegal and that the welfare of the child was the paramount consideration. The court dismissed the petition, allowing the petitioner to seek relief through appropriate legal channels.

Issues: The main issue was the custody of the minor child and the conflicting claims of the petitioner and her in-laws. The court also considered the allegations against the petitioner regarding her husband's death.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized that the welfare of the minor child is the primary consideration in custody matters, and technical objections should not hinder decisions in the child's best interest. The court also highlighted the provisions of the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890, and relevant case law.

Final Decision: The petition seeking custody of the minor child was dismissed, with the petitioner given the liberty to pursue the relief through appropriate legal channels.

JUDGMENT

Sant Parkash, J. - This is a petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of Habeas Corpus with a roving writ to search/release of Amreen Kaur, aged 5 years (minor daughter of petitioner) from the custody of respondent Nos.4 and 5 i.e. father-in-law and mother-in-law of petitioner.

2. Briefly the facts of the present case are that petitioner and her husband Lakhwinder Singh were blessed with a daughter namely Amreen Kaur, aged 5/6 years. On 27.05.2020, petitioner alongwith her husband, daughter and in-laws had 'kheer? in dinner, whereafter the entire family complained of food poisoning and admitted in Pooja Nursing Home & Hospital, Raman, District Bathinda. Though the family (except Lakhwinder Singh) was discharged after having treatment but Lakhwinder Singh died on 30.05.2020. Thereafter, in-laws of petitioner got registered an FIR bearing No.74 dated 02.06.2020 under Sections 307, 302 IPC at Police Station, Raman, Bathinda, against her on the allegations that she was responsible for the death of her husband. During investigation, police did not find petitioner?s guilt but respondent Nos.4 and 5 forcibly took away her minor daughter.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has vehemently contended that respondent Nos.4 and 5 have no legal authority to detain the minor daughter of petitioner. Her minor daughter is just 5/6 years old and she is not maintaining good health. Once the natural guardian i.e. mother of the minor is alive, no other person can claim the custody of minor child. Hence, the petitioner craves for indulgence of this Court to get the custody of her minor daughter from respondent Nos.4 and 5.

4. Learned counsel for the State, on the basis of reply filed on behalf of respondent Nos.1 to 3, has submitted that respondent No.4 - Baljit Singh made a statement before Harnek Singh, SI/SHO, Police Station, Raman, wherein he alleged that on 27.05.2020, some poisonous substance was mixed in the rice pudding (kheer) which was consumed by the family members of petitioner - Sukhjinder Kaur @ Sukhjit Kaur with an intention to kill them. Apart from this, when he intended to serve rice pudding to his grand daughter, she refused to eat by saying that her mother had asked her not to eat it. During investigation, Dr. Gurinder Kaur declared cause of death of Lakhwinder Singh due to respiratory failure. During investigation, police found the petitioner innocent and a cancellation report dated 04.01.2021 was approved by the SSP, Bathinda.

5. Learned counsel for respondent Nos.4 and 5, taking the contents of reply filed on their behalf, submitted that Sub divisional Judicial Magistrate, Talwandi Sabo, vide order dated 29.09.2020 rejected the cancellation report and directed the official respondents to investigate the matter further. Learned counsel has further submitted that petitioner used to quarrel with her husband and respondent No.4 for getting transferred land in her name. On 27.05.2020, petitioner served poisonous sweet dish (kheer), as a result of which, Lakhwinder Singh, son of respondent Nos.4 and 5 lost his life in hospital. Respondent Nos.4 and 5 also remained indoor patients at Jindal Multispecialty Hospital, Talwandi Sabo and discharged on 02.06.2020. On the statement of Baljit Singh - respondent No.4, FIR No.74 dated 02.06.2020 under Sections 307, 302 IPC was registered at Police Station, Raman, against the petitioner. Not only this, petitioner herself abandoned her minor daughter and left matrimonial home. Petitioner has no love & affection with her minor daughter. Moreover, there are disputed questions of law and facts which cannot be decided while availing the remedy under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India and can only be decided after due trial by the Guardian Court. The minor child Amreen Kaur, since her birth, is residing with her grand parents in a joint family. Minor Amreen Kaur is not in illegal custody, rather under protection of her grand par

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top