ANOOP CHITKARA
Harjinder Pal Singh @ Minta – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Anoop Chitkara, J. -
|
| Dated | Police Station | Sections |
| 229 | 10.09.2002 | Banga, District nawanshehar (now S,B.S. Nagar) | 324, 323, 506, 148, 149 of IPC, 1860 (Challan presented u/s 323 and 324 IPC) |
1. Apprehending arrest in the above captioned FIR, the accused has come up before this Court under Section 438 Cr.P.C., seeking anticipatory bail.
NOTICE.
2. Mr. Rana Harjasdeep Singh, learned Deputy Advocate General, Punjab, waives service, and accepts notice on behalf of the respondent and on instructions from ASI Rampal Singh, learned State counsel has strongly opposed the accused's interim protection from arrest.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case and in fact he was under the impression that since case has been compromised, he migrated to Australia in search of better employment opportunities before the compromise was accepted and the case was allowed to be compounded by the learned trial Court. Resultantly, he was declared proclaimed offender by the learned trial court vide order
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.