SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(P&H) 1324

ANOOP CHITKARA
Harjinder Pal Singh @ Minta – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab – Respondent


Advocates:
A.P.S. Rehan, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Anoop Chitkara, J. -

 

Dated

Police Station

Sections

229

10.09.2002

Banga, District nawanshehar (now S,B.S. Nagar)

324, 323, 506, 148, 149 of IPC, 1860 (Challan presented u/s 323 and 324 IPC)

1. Apprehending arrest in the above captioned FIR, the accused has come up before this Court under Section 438 Cr.P.C., seeking anticipatory bail.

NOTICE.

2. Mr. Rana Harjasdeep Singh, learned Deputy Advocate General, Punjab, waives service, and accepts notice on behalf of the respondent and on instructions from ASI Rampal Singh, learned State counsel has strongly opposed the accused's interim protection from arrest.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case and in fact he was under the impression that since case has been compromised, he migrated to Australia in search of better employment opportunities before the compromise was accepted and the case was allowed to be compounded by the learned trial Court. Resultantly, he was declared proclaimed offender by the learned trial court vide order

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
    whatsapp-icon Back to top