ANOOP CHITKARA
Yogesh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Anoop Chitkara, J. -
| FIR No. | Dated | Police Station | Sections |
| 398 | 27.09.2020 | Pataudi, District Gurugram (Haryana) | 147, 149, 323, 324, 506 IPC |
1. The petitioner, arraigned as accused in the above captioned FIR, has come up before this Court under Section 482 CrPC for quashing of the FIR and all consequential proceedings based on the compromise with the aggrieved person.
2. During the pendency of the petition, the accused and the aggrieved person have compromised the matter, and its copy is annexed with this petition as Annexure P-2.
3. After that, the petitioners came up before this Court to quash the FIR, and in the quashing petition, impleading the aggrieved person as respondent. Vide order dated 18.11.2020, the parties were directed to appear before the concerned Court and record their respective statements.
4. On 18.12.2020, the aggrieved persons (respondents No.2 to 5) appeared before the Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Pataudi and stated that there would be no objection if the court quashes this FIR and consequent proceedings. As per the concerned
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.