SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(P&H) 80

GURVINDER SINGH GILL
Raman Chaudhary – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Yadwinder Singh, Advocate, Gurmeet Singh, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Gurvinder Singh Gill, J. - The petitioner seeks grant of regular bail in respect of a case registered vide FIR No.25, dated 23.1.2020 at Police Station Rai, District Sonipat, under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B of Indian Penal Code, Section 12 of Passport Act, 1976 and Section 7 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

2. The allegations, in nutshell, are that one Raju @ Raj Kumar had been able to get a passport issued i.e. passport bearing No.T5136322 on the basis of forged and fabricated documents in the name of Gurveer Singh son of Balwant Singh. It is alleged that the said forged and fabricated documents were verified by the police officials i.e. Constable Rajender and MHC Sukhwant Singh to be the genuine documents, who as a matter of fact were conniving with the other accused and had incorrectly verified the said documents to be correct. It is further the case of prosecution that initially

only Raju @ Raj Kumar was named in the FIR. Upon arrest of Raju @ Raju Kumar, he disclosed the name of Rajender to be the accused. Upon arrest of Rajender, he suffered a disclosure statement nominating Raman Chaudhary (petitioner) and Sukhwant Singh also as accused. When the pe

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top