NIDHI GUPTA
Pritpal Singh – Appellant
Versus
Sh. Aman Kumar – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Nidhi Gupta, J. - This revision petition has been filed by the petitioner/tenant challenging the order dated 5.9.2022 passed by the Rent Controller, Amritsar whereby his application for leave to defend has been dismissed.
2. Brief facts are that in January 2001 Kishan Chand, father of the present respondent/landlord had let out the demised premises - the same being describable as 'building No.4265/18, situated in Gali No. 4, Vijay Nagar, Batala Road, Amritsar' - to the petitioner on a monthly rent of Rs.650/-. Since then the petitioner is stated to have been running his small business in this shop 'Electrical Spare Parts' and has been regularly paying the rent. As per petitioner's own case upon the death of Kishan Chand the petitioner has been regularly paying the rent to the present respondent/landlord.
3. On 28.9.2021 the respondent filed rent petition being RP/409/2021 under Section 13A of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act,1949 (for short 'the 1949 Act') before the Rent Controller, Amritsar, for ejectment of the petitioner inter alia on the ground that this shop is required for his bona fide need as after retirement he wants to run a business of Karyana shop from
Dr.Jagjit Mehta v Dev Brat Sharma
Gurcharan Singh v Gurnam Singh
Harbilas Rai Bansal v. State of Punjab
Harjit Singh v Hav. Amb/Assistant
Precision Steel and Engineering Works v Prem Deva Niranjan Deva Tayal
Rajinder Kumar Vs. Kamaljeet Singh 2019 (1) RCR (Rent) 474
Ram Babu Agarwal v Jay Kishan Das
Shamshad Ahmad and others vs. Tilak Raj Bajaj (deceased) through LRs and others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.