Sanjay Kumar vs Murari Lal Kalra - 2025 Supreme(P&H) 24

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2025 Supreme(P&H) 24

NIDHI GUPTA
Sanjay Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Murari Lal Kalra – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Sanjay Jain Adv.
For the Respondent: Mr. D.S. Matya Adv.

Table of Content
1. tenant disputes landlord's bona fide necessity. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. court discusses statutory compliance for eviction. (Para 4 , 5)
3. landlord's claim is upheld despite non-disclosure. (Para 6 , 12 , 25)
4. final ruling on tenant's continued occupation. (Para 30 , 31 , 33)

JUDGMENT :

Ms. Nidhi Gupta, J.

1. The tenant is in revision against the judgment dated 22.11.2024 passed by the learned Appellate Authority, Ambala allowing the appeal of the respondent/landlord against the dismissal of his ejectment petition by the learned Rent Controller, Ambala vide order dated 04.08.2018; and impugned order dated 22.11.2024 (Annexure P1) whereby application under Order 41 Rule 27 CPC for additional evidence filed by respondent/landlord has been allowed.

2. Brief facts of the case are that the respondent had filed a petition under Section 13 of the Haryana Urban (Control of Rent & Eviction) Act, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”), for the ejectment of the petitioner from the shop bearing private no.4, part of property bearing house tax no.1431/4, situated at Shukul Kund Road, Ambala City and bounded as: North: Shop bearing private no.3, part of H.No. 1431/4, Ambala City;