N. S. SHEKHAWAT
Rajbir Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
N.S. SHEKHAWAT, J.
1. The present appeal is directed against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 07.11.2006 passed by the learned Special Court, Bathinda, whereby the appellant, namely, Rajbir Singh, was convicted for the offence punishable under Section 3 of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the SC & ST Act’) and was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of one year and to pay a fine of Rs.1,000/- with a default stipulation.
2. The FIR in the present case was got registered by Swaranjit Kaur wife of Baljit Singh Caste Majhabi Sikh resident of village Bhagwanpura. The complainant stated that she was married to Baljit Singh about 13 years ago and had three children. She as well as her husband were doing the labour work. At about 08.00 PM on 22.05.2005, the complainant along with her son Karampal Singh aged about 10 years, were going to fetch milk from the house of Bhikar Singh of their village and when they passed in the street in front of the house of Kaka Singh, Rajbir Singh, appellant, was present under the influence of liquor on the platform. On seeing the c
The mens rea is essential to attract the offence punishable under Section 3(1)(x) of the SC & ST Act, and the utterances made in the name of caste should be with an intention to humiliate or intimida....
A conviction under the SC/ST Act requires conclusive proof of intentional insult based on caste; mere verbal disputes over monetary issues do not fulfill this requirement.
The prosecution must prove caste status with reliable documentation for the SC & ST Act to apply, and abuses must occur in public view to constitute an offense.
The importance of prompt lodging of FIR in criminal cases and the need for evidence to establish the presence of the public at the time of the offense to satisfy the criteria of 'public view' under S....
Allegations under the SC/ST Act require intentional insult or intimidation in public view; dismissal of revision upholds trial due to sufficient prima facie evidence.
Sufficient evidence must link alleged acts to an intent to humiliate based on caste identity for the application of the SC/ST Act.
Anticipatory bail not barred under SC/ST Act if FIR and video evidence do not prima facie disclose caste-based insult or abuse ingredients; court verifies electronic material without resolving factua....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.