HARKESH MANUJA
Gazal Chadha – Appellant
Versus
Rajpal Bansal – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Harkesh Manuja, J.
1. This order of mine shall dispose of two petitions under Section 482 Cr.P.C, for quashing of complaints filed under Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881 (hereinafter referred as NI Act), summoning orders as well as the subsequent proceedings arising therefrom. While in CRM-M-1055-2016, the subject matter i.e. complaint No. 8495 dated 27.11.2015 along with summoning order dated 30.11.2015; whereas in CRM-M-1894-2016 it is complaint No. 8497 dated 27.11.2015, besides the summoning order dated 30.11.2015.
2. Facts giving rise to the abovesaid complaints are similar and have been taken from CRM-M-1055-2016 involving complaint No. 8495 dated 27.11.2015, tilted as “Rajpal Bansal Vs. M/s Chadha Motors and others”. In the complaint, it has been alleged that accused no.1 is a partnership concern and accused nos.2 to 5 are the partners who are actively participating in its affairs being responsible for all acts and conduct of business of the same on day to day basis; accused nos.2 to 5 being known to the complainant approached him in the month of April 2014 and represented that because of recession and down fall in the sale of cars, they were in dire need of financial
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.