SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(P&H) 1813

RAJESH BHARDWAJ
Chand Parkash – Appellant
Versus
Anita – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Ms. Prabhjot Kaur, Advocate, for Mr. Ashish Yadav, Advocate, for the Appellant.

JUDGMENT

Rajesh Bhardwaj, J. - The petitioner has approached this Court by way of filing the present revision petition impugning the order dated 6.3.2020 passed by the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Sirsa, whereby maintenance of Rs.10,000/- per month to the respondent-wife been awarded.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has contended that the learned Family Court has failed to appreciate the evidence on record and thus, has drawn a wrong conclusion in awarding maintenance to the tune of Rs.10,000/- per month, which deserves to be set aside. He submits that the respondent-wife never adjusted in the matrimonial home despite the best efforts of the petitioner and his family members. He submits that he was adamant to remain separate from the family of the petitioner and hence, never adjusted in the matrimonial home. He further submits that despite best efforts of the petitioner and his family members, the respondent-wife deserted the matrimonial home and lodged the FIR No.594 dated 4.8.2015, under Sections 498-A, 406, 506 and 323 IPC. He further submits that the view taken by the Family Court is totally based on conjecture and surmises and beyond the evidence on record. He su

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top