SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(P&H) 1838

ANIL KSHETARPAL
National Insurance Co. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Sukhpal Singh – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Rajbir Wasu, Advocate, Parminder Singh, Advocate, Jagwinder Singh, Advocate

JUDGMENT

ANIL KSHETARPAL, J. - This set of four appeals which are connected shall stand disposed of.

2. Challenging the correctness and validity of the award passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal on 2/3/2017, the Insurance Company has filed three appeals, whereas, the fourth appeal has been filed by the claimants. In an automobile accident Harpreet Singh aged about 12 years lost his precious life, whereas, his father Sukhpal Singh and another person Gurpreet Singh suffered injuries.

3. Three claim petitions were filed under Sec. 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The Tribunal while allowing the claim petitions assessed the amount of compensation in the following manner:-

i. Rs.2, 50, 000.00 for the death of Harpreet Singh. ii. Rs.79, 906.00 for the injuries to Gurpreet Singh. iii. Rs.1, 22, 744.00 for the injuries to Sukhpal Singh.

The Insurance Company does not challenge the quantum of the compensation assessed by the Tribunal.

4. This Bench has heard the learned counsel representing the parties at length and with their able assistance perused the paperbooks.

5. The learned counsel representing the Insurance Company contends that in the criminal trial Gurpreet Singh and Su

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top