SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(P&H) 2211

AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH, SANDEEP MOUDGIL
Budhi (since Deceased) Through His Lrs – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. Aditya Jain, Advocate, for the Appellant

JUDGMENT

Augustine George Masih, J. - Petitioners have approached this Court challenging the order dated 21.11.2006 (Annexure P-1) passed by the Assistant Collector, 1st Grade, Palwal-respondent No. 4, whereby petition preferred under Section 7 of the Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as 1961 Act') seeking eviction of the petitioners by private respondents No. 5 to 11 was allowed and a fine of Rs. 4000/- per hectare yearly was imposed upon them, order dated 31.05.2011 (Annexure P-2) passed by the District Collector, Palwal-respondent No. 3 dismissing the appeal of the petitioners and the order dated 15.01.2021 (Annexure P-3) passed by the Commissioner, Faridabad Division, Faridabad-respondent No. 2 dismissing the revision petition.

2. It is the contention of the learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners have been given an opportunity to lead evidence as the question of title arises in the present case. The predecessors-in-interest of the petitioners had built the houses on the land during the year 1938-39. The possession being prior to 26.01.1950, the cut off date, the petitioners being in continuous possession of the said land

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top