Back
JASJIT SINGH BEDI
Krishan – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Jasjit Singh Bedi, J. - The prayer in the present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is for the quashing of FIR No.164 dated 26.05.2019 under Sections 66, 66b, 66d of the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008, Section 120-B, 201, 420, 467, 468 and 471 IPC registered at Police Station Rewari City, District Rewari (Annexure P-1), the report under Section 173(8) Cr.P.C. dated 12.02.2020 (Annexure P-3), the impugned charge-sheet dated 02.12.2019 (Annexure P-12) and all other subsequent proceedings arising therefrom.
2. The brief facts of the case as emanating from the pleadings are that the impugned FIR came to be registered on 26.05.2019 on the basis of a written complaint of the complainant Inspector Anand Kumar in which he stated that he was performing his examination duty at Jain Girls Senior Secondary School, Rewari, where EASI Balwant Singh, Incharge, Cyber Cell, Rewari reached and told him that on 24.05.2019, an E-mail had been received on the official E-mail id of Superintendent of Police, Rewari, whereby it had been stated that an attempt would be made by certain elements to leak out the answer-key of the examination for the post of Naib Tehsildar being organised
The main legal point established in the judgment is the importance of admissible evidence and the abuse of process of the Court in determining the continuation of proceedings. The judgment emphasizes....
FIR not quashable where allegations of blocking judicial officer's residence and demanding bail prima facie show criminal trespass intent to intimidate; no mini-trial, accept FIR as true, especially ....
The High Court should not exercise its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to quash criminal proceedings or conduct a mini-trial to verify the truthfulness or reliability of allegations once a cha....
The court affirmed that the inherent powers under Section 482 of the CrPC should be exercised sparingly, emphasizing that acquittal of a co-accused does not automatically warrant quashing proceedings....
Exercise of jurisdiction under Section 482 of the CrPC for quashing an FIR should be sparingly and carefully exercised, and the court cannot examine disputed questions of fact at this stage.
Economic Offences - Court can exercise the powers under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. wherein the complaint does not disclose committing of any cognizable offence and the same is filed with an ulterior moti....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
