SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(P&H) 1741

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Gurbir Singh, J.
Jagjit Singh @ Jaggi – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab – Respondent
CRM-M-8721-2019
Decided On : 12-12-2022

Advocates appeared:
Mr. Ravi Kamal Gupta, Advocate, for the Appellant; Mr. G. S. Shergill, Aag, Punjab, for the Respondent.

Compliance with the provisions of Section 82 Cr.P.C. is essential in declaring a person as absconder.

Headnote:

Section 82 Cr.P.C. - Proclamation for person absconding - The court set aside the order declaring the petitioner as absconder as it was found to be against the provisions of Section 82 Cr.P.C., which requires a written proclamation to be published requiring the person to appear at a specific place and time, not less than thirty days from the date of publishing such proclamation.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner was declared absconder and subsequent proceedings were initiated under Section 174-A IPC based on an order dated 09.02.2018. The petitioner had applied for anticipatory bail, was granted interim bail, and was regularly appearing before the Court. The proclamation issued was found to be in violation of the provisions of Section 82 Cr.P.C.

Finding of the Court:

The court set aside the order declaring the petitioner as absconder, emphasizing the need for compliance with the provisions of Section 82 Cr.P.C. and directing the Courts of Judicial Magistrates to adhere to the true letter and spirit of the said provision.

Issues: Violation of provisions of Section 82 Cr.P.C. in declaring the petitioner as absconder.

Ratio Decidendi: The court found that the order declaring the petitioner as absconder was against the provisions of Section 82 Cr.P.C. as the proclamation was not published in accordance with the requirements of the section.

Final Decision: The order declaring the petitioner as absconder was set aside, and the Courts of Judicial Magistrates were directed to adhere to the provisions of Section 82 Cr.P.C.

JUDGMENT

Gurbir Singh, J. - This is a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing the order dated 09.02.2018 (Annexure P-8), whereby the petitioner has been ordered to be declared absconder and all subsequent proceedings initiated under Section 174-A IPC.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that vide order dated 09.02.2018 passed by learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate (SDJM), Nabha (Annexure P-8), the petitioner was declared absconder. It was further ordered therein that intimation be sent to the concerned SHO so as to enable him to initiate proceedings under Section 174-A IPC.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the proclamation was issued on 22.05.2017 and the petitioner was required to appear before the SDJM, Nabha on 13.06.2017. The proclamation was marked to the concerned Police Post on 02.06.2017 (Annexure P-7), whereby direction was given to the petitioner to appear before the Court on 13.06.2017. Statement of serving Constable was recorded on 05.09.2017 that he made compliance on 12.06.2017. It was stated that one copy of notice was pasted on the wall of house of accused and the other copy of notice was pasted on a conspicuous place on the turning of street of the mohalla, whereas, in fact, no such order was pasted on the wall of the house or conspicuous place. The petitioner applied for anticipatory bail. He was granted interim bail. He is regularly appearing before the Court. Challan was presented on 08.05.2018 (Annexure P-11).

4. Learned State Counsel has opposed the prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner in view of provisions laid down under Section 82 Cr.P.C., which reads as under :-

    Section 82 - Proclamation for person absconding

    (1) If any Court has reason to believe (whether after taking evidence or not) that any person against whom a warrant has been issued by it has absconded or is concealing himself so that such warrant cannot be executed, such Court may publish a written proclamation requiring him to appear at a specific place and at a specified time not less than thirty days from the date of publishing such proclamation.

    (2) The proclamation shall be published as follows -

    (i) a) it shall be publicly read in some conspicuous place of the town or village in which such person ordinarily resides ;

    b) it shall be affixed to some conspicuous part of the house or home-stead in which such person ordinarily resides or to some conspicuous place of such town or village ;

    c) a copy thereof shall be affixed to some conspicuous part of the Court house ;

    (ii) the Court may also, if it thinks fit, direct a copy of the proclamation to be published in a daily newspaper circulating in the place in which such person ordinarily resides.

    (3) A statement in writing by the Court issuing the proclamation to the effect that the proclamation was duly published on a specified day, in the manner specified in clause (i) of SubSection (2), shall be conclusive evidence that the requirements of this section have been complied with, and that the proclamation was published on such day.

    (4) Where a proclamation published under Sub-Section (1) is in respect of a person accused of an offence punishable under section 302, 304, 364, 367, 382, 392, 393, 394, 395, 396, 397, 398, 399, 400, 402, 436, 449, 459 or 460 of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860) and such person fails to appear at the specified place and time required by the proclamation, the Court may, after making such inquiry as it thinks fit, pronounce him a proclaimed offender and make a declaration to that effect.

    (5) The provisions of Sub-Sections (2) and (3) shall apply to a declaration made by the Court under Sub-Section (4) as they apply to the proclamation published under Sub-Section (1).'

    5. As per Section 82(1) Cr.P.C., a Court is required to publish a written proclamation requiring the person concerned to appear at a specific place and at a specified time, not less than thirty days from the date of publishing such proclamation.

    6. In the p

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    Judicial Analysis

    AI

    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon Back to top