SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(P&H) 1768

VIVEK PURI
Inder Kaur – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. Rahul Vats, Advocate, for the Appellant; Mr. Karan Garg, AAG, Haryana, for the Respondent.

JUDGMENT

Vivek Puri, J. - The present appeal has been preferred against the judgment of conviction dated 26.03.2004 vide which the appellants have been convicted under Sections 498-A, 304-B read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code (for short 'IPC') and the order of sentence dated 27.03.2004 vide which they have been sentenced as following:-

1)

498-A/34 IPC

To undergo rigorous imprisonment for three years with fine of Rs.500/-each and in default of payment of fine, to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for three months each.

2)

304-B/34 IPC

To undergo rigorous imprisonment for seven years with fine of Rs.1000/-each and in default of payment of fine, to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for six months each.

It was further directed that all the substantive sentences shall run concurrently

2. The appellants have been set up to face trial for having commission of offence under Section 304-B/34 of IPC by the Officer incharge, Police Station City Gurgaon.

3. Briefly the case of the prosecution is to the effect that the marriage of Harjit Kaur deceased

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
    whatsapp-icon Back to top