SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(P&H) 1757

ARCHANA PURI
Lakhbir Singh – Appellant
Versus
Kulwant Singh – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. Rajinder Goyal, Advocate, for the Appellant; Mr. H.S.Dhillon, Advocate, for the Respondent.

JUDGMENT

Archana Puri, J. - Challenge in the present revision petition is to the order dated 07.04.2022 (Annexure P-11) passed by learned Addl. Civil Judge (Sr. Divn.), whereby, an application filed by the respondents-plaintiffs, for seeking permission to examine handwriting expert, was allowed.

2. The brief facts, as culled out, from the paper-book, are as herein given:-

That, initially respondents-plaintiffs had filed a suit for symbolic possession by way of specific performance of agreement to sell dated 23.06.2008 with consequential relief of permanent injunction. As per version of the respondents-plaintiffs, agreement to sell dated 23.06.2008 was allegedly executed by the petitioner-defendant, in favour of the respondents-plaintiffs, for a total consideration of Rs.28,60,000/-. Having received the entire sale consideration on the date of agreement to sell, the actual physical possession of the suit property was handed over to the respondents-plaintiffs. Also, it is the version that respondents-plaintiffs shall be entitled to get the sale deed executed and registered in their favour, at any time, after giving fifteen days' notice.

3. In pursuance of the notice issued, the petitione

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top