SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(P&H) 723

DEEPAK GUPTA
Anil Kumar Parnami – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. Girdhari Arora, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Parveen Kumar Aggarwal, DAG, Haryana.

DEEPAK GUPTA, J.

Prayer in this petition filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is for grant of regular bail in case FIR No.0128 dated 14.03.2018 registered under Sections 477-A, 468, 424, 420, 409, 405, 34 and 120A of IPC, 1860 and under Section 3 of Haryana Protection of Interest of Depositors (in Financial Establishment) Act, 2013 at Police Station New Colony, District Gurugram, Haryana.

2. FIR was lodged on the complaint of one Dinesh Jain, as per which, in 2013, Tribhuvan Kumar Parnami induced his brother-in-law Surender Kumar Jain to invest money with them with the assurance of good return of interest @ 12 to 18% and that amount of ?29 lacs was invested. Accused paid interest for some time but thereafter stopped making any payment. On demand, accused not only refused to pay, rather threatened the investors.

3. It was found during investigation that not only the complainant but various other investors were duped with the total amount of more than ? 12 crores. It was further found during investigation that amount had been deposited in the name of various Companies i.e. M.R. Agro Tech Pvt. Ltd., GL Parnami Marketing Company, Signature Finance Pvt. Ltd, etc., in which petitioner was also o

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top