HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI
Richa Chandna – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent
HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J.
1. Present petition has been filed by the petitioner claiming the interest upon the arrears of salary/pension for which she was found entitled for on revision of her pay and consequent pension in respect of the service rendered by her mother namely Smt. Sushil Prabha Chandna, who was working as a Lecturer with the respondent-State of Haryana.
2. As per the petitioner, the salary of the mother of the petitioner was revised by the respondents and the consequent pensionary benefits were also revised due to which, certain arrears became admissible, which arrears though have been paid but the interest upon the said arrears have not been released to the petitioner though, the benefit of interest has already been granted the benefit of interest by the respondent-Department to a similarly situated employee namely Dr. R.N. Singh, who was also extended the similar relief, hence, on the ground of parity, the petitioner be also paid interest on the arrears of salary/arrears of pension, which has been released in her favour.
3. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that keeping in view the reply filed by the State, it is a conceded position that Dr. R.N. Singh was a
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.