SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(P&H) 807

HARPREET SINGH BRAR
Manoj Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. Rajkapoor Malik, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Manish Dadwal, AAG, Haryana.

HARPREET SINGH BRAR, J.

1. The present petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing the impugned order dated 28.07.2023 (Annexure P-1) passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Hisar in case FIR No.709 dated 03.11.2020 under Sections 193, 297, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B IPC (Sections 7, 13 (1) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 added later on) registered at Police Station Hansi City, District Hansi vide which bail of the petitioner herein stands cancelled and he has been summoned by way of warrants of arrest for 07.10.2023.

2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, inter alia, contends that the petitioner has been putting in appearance before the learned trial Court on each and every date of hearing after he was granted regular bail vide order dated 24.04.2023 passed by this Court in CRM-M No.18517 of 2023 titled as Manoj Kumar Vs. State of Haryana. He refers to various interlocutory orders passed by the learned trial Court to show that the petitioner has been regularly appearing before the learned trial Court and he never absented on any date of hearing. On 28.07.2023, the petitioner was suffering from eye flu and got his medical check-up done at Governmen

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top