SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(P&H) 1056

NIDHI GUPTA
Rekha Rani – Appellant
Versus
Naresh Kumar – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Ms. Poorva Gupta, Advocate for the petitioners.

NIDHI GUPTA, J.

1. Present revision petition has been filed for setting aside the impugned order dated 22.11.2022 (Annexure P-5) passed by Ld. Additional District Judge, Yamuna Nagar whereby the order dated 21.12.2017 (Annexure P-3) passed by Ld. Civil Judge (Senior Division), Yamuna Nagar granting maintenance of Rs.10,000/- per month to petitioner no.2-minor Muskan, has been set aside.

2. Brief facts of the case are that the petitioner no.1 is daughter-in-law, and petitioner no.2 is minor granddaughter of the respondents herein. Petitioner no.2 is represented through her Natural Guardian and her next friend, her mother-petitioner no.1. Deceased Vineet Kumar was son of respondent no.1 while respondent no.2 is his step mother. Petitioner no.1 is widow of deceased Vineet Kumar. He was murdered in the year 2013 while in judicial custody. It is case of the petitioners that after the death of Vineet Kumar, she was thrown out of her matrimonial home. She had no source of income and required at least Rs.25,000/- per month for basic amenities whereas the respondents have ancestral property in the shape of 10 acres of agricultural land, and respondent no.1 also purchased 4-1/2 acres of land i

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
    whatsapp-icon Back to top