Hem Raj vs State of Haryana - 2023 Supreme(P&H) 1095

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(P&H) 1095

KARAMJIT SINGH
Hem Raj – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent

Advocates appeared:
Mr. Sahil Gupta, Advocate with Mr. Vivek Tripathi, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Naveen Kumar Sheoran, DAG, Haryana.

KARAMJIT SINGH, J.

1. Prayer is for grant of regular bail in case having FIR No.724 dated 19.12.2021 registered under Sections 147, 148, 323, 325, 307, 506 IPC (Sections 325 and 307 IPC added later on) at Police Station Mujessar, District Faridabad.

2. The FIR in the present case was registered on the basis of the statement of Rahul Bansal, in which he alleged that on 18.12.2021 construction work was going in a shop and construction material was stored in the street to which the opposite party objected and asked the complainant to remove the construction material from there, as it was difficult for parking of car. In the meantime co-accused Lal Chand called his sons including the petitioner who started manhandling the complainant and his brother Yogesh Bansal and all of them caused injuries to the complainant and his brother with different weapons.

3. The counsel for the petitioner inter alia submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case at the instance of the opposite party. That actually opposite party caused injuries to brother of the petitioner regarding which FIR No.744 dated 25.12.2021 was registered in the police station against the opposite party. The co

Click Here to Read the rest of this document