SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(P&H) 2254

AVNEESH JHINGAN
State of Haryana – Appellant
Versus
Rajinder Parshad – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Parties : Mr. Gurmeet Singh AAG, Haryana, Mr. Jitender Nara

Table of Content
1. factual basis of corruption case (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. defense challenges prosecution's claims (Para 4 , 9 , 10)
3. discrepancies in witness testimonies noted (Para 6 , 7 , 8)
4. parameters for appeal against acquittal (Para 11)
5. court affirms trial court's judgment (Para 12 , 13 , 14)

Judgment

Mr. Avneesh Jhingan, J.

The State has filed the appeal against acquittal of Rajinder Parshad (respondent) in FIR No. 15 dated 13.5.2002, under Sections 7 and 13 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, registered at Police Station State Vigilance Bureau, Gurgaon.

2. As per the case set up by the prosecution, complainant-Ganesh Sharma made a complaint on 13.5.2002 to the Vigilance Department. It was alleged that he visited the office of SDO-I of Electricity Department with regard to release of 20 KV electric connection for his plot situated in Kadipur Industrial Area, Gurgaon. He was asked to submit fresh test report though he had already submitted the test report. He met the respondent posted as Junior Engineer, who demanded Rs.20,000/- as illegal gratification for releasing the electric connection. He told the complainant to pay Rs.9,000/- immediately and remaining Rs.11,00

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top