SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(P&H) 1744

SUDHIR MITTAL
Harwinder Singh – Appellant
Versus
Gurpreet Singh – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Parties : Mr. L.S. Mann

Judgment

Mr. Sudhir Mittal, J.

This Regular Second Appeal arises out of a suit for specific performance of agreement to sell. The date of the agreement to sell is 05.05.2006 and the same is Ex.P1 on the record. Defendant No.1 agreed to sell his land measuring 01 bigha, 16 biswa and 11 biswansi to the plaintiffs for a total consideration of Rs.2,10,000/-. The entire consideration was paid at the time of execution of agreement to sell and possession was also delivered. Defendant No.1 had undertaken to get the sale deed registered after mutation of inheritance from his mother, namely, Ravinder Kaur was sanctioned in his favour. Suit has been decreed and appeal has been dismissed. The second appeal has been preferred by defendant No.2 i.e. subsequent purchaser.

2. Other relevant facts are that defendant No.1 i.e. the owner, threatened to alienate suit property in August, 2006 which led to the filing of a suit for permanent injunction by the plaintiffs. In reply, defendant No.1 admitted the agreement to sell as is evident from the judgment of the trial Court. The suit was finally decided vide award dated 01.05.2010 passed by the Lok Adalat which is Ex.P4 on the record. The award is based

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top