SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(P&H) 1545

ARCHANA PURI
Mamta – Appellant
Versus
Hem Raj Khanna – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Parties : Mr. Ajay Jain, Mr. Shalender Mohan

Judgment

Mrs. Archana Puri, J.

Challenge in the present revision petition is to the order dated 11.10.2022 passed by learned Civil Judge (Jr. Divn.), whereby, an application filed by the petitioners under Order 22 Rule 10 read with Section 151 CPC, has been dismissed.

2. The material facts, as culled out from the paper-book are that, initially, respondents No.1 and 2 (who are plaintiffs before the lower Court) had filed a suit for seeking relief of separate possession of half share through partition by metes and bounds, in respect of shop consisting of two ‘khans’ bearing No.21, Ward No.XV, as detailed in paragraph 1 of judgment, copy whereof is Annexure P-1.

3. As evident from the judgment dated 22.05.2018 (Annexure P- 1), the said suit was dismissed. Respondents No.1 and 2 (plaintiff) had filed an appeal. Vide order dated 16.12.2021, the judgment and decree dated 22.05.2018 was set aside and the case was remanded back to the lower court, with the direction to take additional evidence of the plaintiff, as permitted by the Court and also to afford an opportunity, to the defendant, to rebut the additional evidence and learned lower Court was further directed to record/return its find

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top