Back
ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL
Karam Chand Sandhu – Appellant
Versus
Kaushalya Devi – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appellant challenges lower court's decree. (Para 1) |
| 2. appellant relies on the validity of the will. (Para 2) |
| 3. plaintiff argues will's suspicious circumstances. (Para 3) |
| 4. details of suit property and evidence presented. (Para 5) |
| 5. supreme court's precedent discussed on will proof. (Para 6) |
| 6. appeal dismissed, affirming lower court's ruling. (Para 7 , 8) |
Judgment
Mr. Anupinder Singh Grewal, J.
The appellant has challenged the judgments and decree of the Courts below whereby the suit preferred by the respondents-plaintiffs for declaration and in the alternative for joint possession has been decreed to the extent of 1/4° share of respondent No.1-plaintiff in the suit property and the appeal thereagainst has been dismissed.
2. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the suit land was owned by the appellant-defendant and mutation had been validly carried out. He had become the owner on account of Will dated 15.04.1977 duly executed by his father Piara Singh in his favour. He further submits that the Will had been duly proved as an attesting witness had been examined. He has cited the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of P.S. Sairam and another versus P.S
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
