SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(P&H) 1461

ALKA SARIN
Sunder – Appellant
Versus
Lala Ram through his LRs – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Parties : Mr. Ashok Kaushik, Mr. Arihant Jain

Table of Content
1. background of suit and encroachment issues. (Para 1 , 2)
2. impugned order directions about encroachment. (Para 3)
3. arguments regarding enforcements of injunctions. (Para 4 , 5)
4. court's analysis on evidence of encroachment. (Para 6 , 7)
5. conclusion and remanding the case. (Para 8)

Judgment

Mrs. Alka Sarin, J.

The present revision petition has been filed challenging the order dated 11.11.2016 whereby the application filed under Order XXI Rule 32 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 has been allowed.

2. The brief facts relevant to the present lis are that respondent Nos.1 and 2 herein filed a suit for permanent injunction and mandatory injunction. Vide judgment and decree dated 28.02.2009, only a decree for permanent injunction was passed and the decree for mandatory injunction was declined. On 12.10.2011 respondent Nos.1 and 2 filed an application under Order XXI Rule 32 CPC for directions to remove the encroachment from the rasta on the suit property. The details when the property was encroached upon are woefully missing from the said application. A reply was filed to the said application. Vide order dated 22.08.2014 the said application was allowed by the Execut

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top