SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(P&H) 1408

HARKESH MANUJA
Harbans Kaur – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Parties : Mr. P.K.S. Phoolka, Mr. V.K. Gupta AAG, Punjab

Table of Content
1. overview of case and prior decisions. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. arguments regarding application under section 323 crpc. (Para 4 , 5)
3. court's reasoning on maintaining charges. (Para 6 , 7 , 8)
4. final dismissal of the petition. (Para 9)

Judgment

Mr. Harkesh Manuja, J.

By way of present petition filed under Section 482 CrPC, prayer has been made for setting aside orders dated 21.02.2018 and 09.03.2021 passed by the Courts below whereby an application filed under Section 323 CrPC, at the instance of petitioner-complainant for committing the case to Court of Sessions by framing charge under Section 302 IPC stands declined.

2. In the present case, arising out of an incident dated 26.05.2014, FIR No.35 dated 04.06.2014 under Sections 323 , 325 and 34 IPC was registered at P.S. Phul, District Bathinda, based on a complaint submitted by one Mohinder Singh who later unfortunately expired on 06.06.2014 resulting into inclusion of offence under Section 302 IPC in the aforementioned FIR. Upon investigation, based on statement made by doctors, challan was filed under Section 323 , 325 and 34 IPC. Having considered the challan as well as having heard the parties, trial Court ordered f

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top