SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(P&H) 1772

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
N.S. Shekhawat, J.
Jagtar Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent
CRA-S No. 1704-SB of 2003
Decided On : 10-01-2023

Advocates appeared:
For the Parties : Mr. K.P.S. Virk

Headnote:(A) Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Section 15 and Section 42 - Conviction under Section 15 for possession of narcotic substances - Appellant convicted and sentenced to ten years rigorous imprisonment and fine of Rs. 1,00,000/- - Appeal contested on grounds of procedural non-compliance including failure to record secret information in writing, and absence of independent witnesses during search operations. (Paras 9-26)

(B) Legal Obligations - Mandatory statutory provisions surrounding search and seizure under the NDPS Act - Non-compliance with Section 42 (writing of secret information) and Section 52-A (inventory certification by Magistrate) renders prosecution case infirm. (Paras 11-19)

Facts of the case:
The appellant was apprehended while in possession of 19 bags containing poppy husk. The police, acting on secret information, conducted a search without following mandatory procedures, leading to his conviction and subsequent appeal. (Paras 1-6)

Findings of Court:
The trial court's reliance on procedural irregularities was found erroneous, as failure to comply with the NDPS Act vitiated the entire trial, deeming the evidence inadmissible. (Paras 24-26)

Issues: Whether the secret information was appropriately documented and conveyed as per the NDPS Act's requirements, and whether the failure to follow mandated procedures invalidated the conviction. (Paras 9-10)

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that strict compliance with statutory provisions under the NDPS Act is imperative; failure to document secret information and to present case property for inventory certification resulted in grounds for acquittal. (Paras 18-19)

Result: Conviction set aside and appellant acquitted.

Table of Content
1. conviction under ndps act with specific facts. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. prosecution evidence and defense claims. (Para 4 , 5 , 6)
3. argument against compliance with ndps provisions. (Para 9 , 10)
4. non-compliance of section 42 ndps. (Para 11 , 18)
5. section 52-a and section 57 violations. (Para 19 , 20 , 21)
6. judgment analysis leading to reversal. (Para 22 , 23 , 24)
7. final conclusion and order of acquittal. (Para 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29)

Judgment

Mr. N.S. Shekhawat, J.

The present appeal is directed against the judgment of conviction 23.07.2003 and order of sentence dated 24.07.2003 passed by the learned Judge, Special Court, Kaithal, whereby, the present appellant was convicted under Section 15 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (hereinafter to be referred as ‘the NDPS Act) and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for ten years and to pay a fine of Rs. 1,00,000/- alongwith default stipulation.

2. The brief facts of the present case are that on 18.07.1999, ASI Om Parkash, In-charge, Police Post, Ramthali was present on a road, which leads from Guhla to Kharka alongwith other police officials and a secret information was received that gunny bags of poppy husk had been loaded in a truck and the said truck was being driven by Jagtar Singh son of Jeet Singh and Hardeep Singh son of Gurcharan Singh is also with him in the said truck. The said two accused were in the habit of selling poppy husk and if a picket was set up, the accused could be apprehended with the truck carrying the poppy husk. One truck was seen coming from the side of Guhla after some time and was signalled to stop by the police party. When the truck was signalled to stop with the light of the torch, Hardeep Singh, who was known to the Investigating Officer, alighted from the truck and fled away. He was identified by ASI Om Parkash as they were previously known to each other. Jagtar Singh, driver was apprehended at the spot. After his arrest, a notice under Section 50 of the NDPS Act was served upon the accused Jagtar Singh and the offer regarding search was given to him. The accused opted to get his search conducted in the presence of a gazetted officer, as per his reply Ex. PC and a memo was prepared in this regard. Om Parkash Kadiayan, the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Guhla was telephonically informed and he reached at the spot. He again informed the accused, after being apprised of the facts of the case. At the instance of Om Parkash Kadiyan, the Deputy Superintendent of Police, ASI Om Parkash conducted the search of truck and on checking, 19 gunny bags containing poppy husk were found loaded in the truck upon unloading and weighing, the weight of each gunny bag was found to be 40 kgs. Out of each gunny bags, 250 grams poppy husk was separated for the purpose of sample and the same were made into parcels. The residue quantity of poppy husk was also converted into a separate parcel and the seal ‘OP’ of the Investigating Officer and ‘OPK’ of the Deputy Superintendent of Police were affixed on the same. Seal ‘OP’ was handed over to HC Satyawan after use whereas seal ‘OPK’ was kept by the Deputy Superintendent of Police with himself. The sample parcel, residue parcel, sample seal impressions, truck, RC etc., were taken into possession by the police and the ruka Ex.PA was sent to the police station for registration of the FIR, on the basis of which, formal FIR Ex.PA/1 was recorded. Rough site plan was prepared and the statements of the witnesses were recorded. Notice under Section 52 of the Act was served upon Jagtar Singh and accused/witnesses/case property and truck were produced before the Station House Officer of Police Station Guhla on the said day for verification. SHO also verified the facts of the case and had put an additional seal of ‘RS’ on the sample parcels, residue bags and directed the police party to deposit the case property with the MHC. A report under Section 57 of the Act was again prepared and w

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top