SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(P&H) 3001

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
N.S. SHEKHAWAT, J.
Samey Singh & Anr. – Appellants
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent
CRA-S-1543-SB-2004 (O&M)
Decided On : 09-01-2023

Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Vibhor Bansal, Advocate; For the Appellant
Ms. Sheenu Sura, DAG, Haryana.

Headnote:(A) Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Section 15 - Appeal against conviction - Appellants convicted for possessing 35 kgs of poppy husk and sentenced to three years imprisonment and fine - Mandatory provisions of Sections 42 and 50 were not complied with, rendering the conviction unsustainable - Total non-compliance with mandatory provisions of law affects the prosecution case. (Paras 8, 12, 13)

(B) Due Process and Rights of Accused - The accused must be individually informed of their rights prior to search, and joint notice violated the purpose of individual notification. (Paras 8, 9)

Facts of the case:
On 19.04.2002, police acted on secret information leading to the apprehension of the appellants and seizure of contraband, however, procedural violations in recording information impaired the prosecution's credibility.

Findings of Court:
The mandatory requirements of Section 42 were not adhered to, necessitating acquittal.

Issues: The main issues included the applicability of Sections 42 and 50 of the NDPS Act and whether the search adhered to statutory mandates.

Ratio Decidendi: The conviction was overturned due to a failure to comply with mandatory search procedures, emphasizing that legal provisions must be followed to uphold due process and the rights of the accused.

Result: Appeal allowed; conviction set aside, and appellants acquitted.

Table of Content
1. conviction under ndps act. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. prosecution's evidence and witness testimonies. (Para 4 , 5 , 6)
3. arguments on compliance with ndps provisions. (Para 8 , 9)
4. supreme court interpretations of sections 42 & 50 of ndps. (Para 10 , 11 , 12)
5. appeal allowed, previous conviction overturned. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16)

JUDGMENT

N.S. Shekhawat, J.

The present appeal challenges the impugned judgment of conviction 13.07.2004 and order of sentence dated 15.07.2004 passed by the learned Judge, Special Court, Panchkula, whereby, the present appellants were convicted under Section 15 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (hereinafter to be referred as 'the NDPS Act) and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for three years and to pay a fine of Rs. 5000/- each alongwith default stipulation.

2. The brief facts of the case are that on 19.04.2002, ASI Karan Singh alongwith other police officials was present on Bus Stand Mauli for patrolling and crime prevention on a Government vehicle and in the meantime, a secret information was received that three persons, namely, Virender son of Sadhu Ram, Samey Singh son of Badan Singh, Randhir Singh son of Nohria Singh used to bring poppy husk from village Mauli in a Fiat car bearing registration No. HR01-B-1943. If a raid was conducted huge quantity of contraband could be recovered from their car. On getting the said information, a naka was set up. In the meanwhile, a Fiat car was seen coming from Ambala and Kakrali side with high speed and on seeing the police party, the driver of the car stopped the car and started turning the car back. However, ASI Karan Singh with the help of other police officials controlled those persons and the vehicle. In the meantime, the car driver ran away from the spot, leaving behind his car and two persons were sitting on the rear seat of the car. Two persons were taken into custody and they disclosed their names and addresses as Samey Singh son of Badan Singh, resident of village Toba and Randhir Singh son of Nohria Singh, resident of Badmali District Ropar. They also disclosed that the person who had ran way from the spot was Virender @ Mintu son of Sadhu Singh, resident of Mahesh Nagar, Ambala Cantt. The police party raised a suspicion that accused were having contraband in their possession in the car and Jag Parvesh Dahiya, the Deputy Superintendent of Police, was informed telephonically, who reached at the spot with his staff and also verified the facts and the notice under Section 50 of the NDPS Act. On the direction of Jag Parvesh Dahiya, the Deputy Superintendent of Police, search was made by ASI Karan Singh and a plastic bag was found, which was kept by both the accused on the rear seat and after taking out, the bag was opened and 35 kgs of poppy husk was found in the same. 500 grams of the poppy husk was taken out as sample from the plastic bag and the sample as well as residue quantity of the contraband were sealed separately by ASI Karan Singh with the seal impression 'KS' and the seal was handed over to ASI Kehar Singh after use. Jag Parvesh Dahiya, the Deputy Superintendent of Police, also affixed his seal impression 'JP' on the sample parcel and after use, he kept the seal with himself. Samples seals were prepared and were taken into possession by the police. Ruka was sent to the police station and on receipt of the ruka, FIR in the instant case was registered. After necessary investigation, the challan was presented against both the appellants in the competent Court. The sample sent to the FSL was analyzed by the FSL and it was found to be containing poppy straw (chura post).

3. After presentation of the challan, the appellants were charge-sheeted under Section 15 of the NDPS Act, to which, they pleaded not guilty and claimed trial.

4. In support of its case, the prosecution examined 11 witnesses.

5. EHC Ramesh Kumar was examined as PW1. On 30.04.2002, MHC Jai Singh had handed over a sealed parcel

                                                                              Click Here to Read the rest of this document
                                                                              1
                                                                              2
                                                                              3
                                                                              4
                                                                              5
                                                                              6
                                                                              7
                                                                              8
                                                                              9
                                                                              10
                                                                              11
                                                                              SupremeToday Portrait Ad
                                                                              supreme today icon
                                                                              logo-black

                                                                              An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

                                                                              Please visit our Training & Support
                                                                              Center or Contact Us for assistance

                                                                              qr

                                                                              Scan Me!

                                                                              India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

                                                                              For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

                                                                              whatsapp-icon Back to top