SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(P&H) 1771

N. S. SHEKHAWAT
... – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Parties : Mr. Balvinder Sangwan, Ms. Sheenu Sura DAG, Haryana

Table of Content
1. factual background of the appeal (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. arguments for and against bail (Para 4 , 5)
3. judicial observations and analysis (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9)
4. decision on bail application (Para 10)
5. conditions for bail and limitations on scope (Para 11 , 12)

Judgment

Mr. N.S. Shekhawat J.

The appellant/ “Child In conflict with Law” (hereinafter referred to as the “CCL”) has filed the present appeal under Section-101 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of the Children), Act 2015 (hereinafter referred to as the “Act”) to challenge the order dated 28.10.2022, passed by the Court of Learned Additional Sessions Judge, Faridabad, in case FIR No.775 dated 02.12.2020 under Sections 302 and 34 of IPC ( Section 34 of IPC deleted and Section 25 of the ARMS ACT added later on), registered at Police Station Palla, Faridabad, whereby the bail application filed by the appellant/CCL was ordered to be dismissed.

2. The story of the prosecution, as projected in the report under Section 173 Cr.PC is as follows:-

3. As per the complainant Dilip Kumar, at about 06:30 PM on 02.12.2020, he was present in his house, he received a phone call from his neighbour Rohit son of Shiv Char

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top