Back
MANJARI NEHRU KAUL
Tirlok Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition for anticipatory bail under cr.p.c. (Para 1) |
| 2. no specific role attributed to the petitioner. (Para 2) |
| 3. petitioner complied with investigation requirements. (Para 3) |
| 4. state counsel confirms petitioner's cooperation. (Para 4) |
| 5. grant of anticipatory bail made absolute. (Para 5) |
Judgment
Mrs. Manjari Nehru Kaul, J.
The petitioner is seeking the concession of anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in case FIR No.52, dated 30.01.2023 (Annexure P-1), under Sections 406 and 420 of the IPC, registered at Police Station Mahesh Nagar, District Ambala.
2. Vide order dated 16.02.2023, a Coordinate Bench of this Court had been granted interim anticipatory bail to the petitioner with direction to join investigation and the relevant part of the said order reads as under:-
“Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that no specific role has been attributed to the present petitioner but the co-accused Santokh Singh, who is real brother of the present petitioner, is the culprit, who sold out 165 square yards i.e., the land which does not belong to him as 200 square yards of the land stood already sold to one Abha Tiwari by the petitioner as well as his brothe
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
