Back
ALKA SARIN
Satnam Singh – Appellant
Versus
Kuldip Singh – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of the case facts regarding loan and cheque misuse. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. details of the amendment application and its dismissal. (Para 4) |
| 3. arguments for and against allowing the amendment. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. criteria for granting amendments in legal proceedings. (Para 9 , 10) |
| 5. court's decision to allow the amendment with costs. (Para 11) |
Judgment
Mrs. Alka Sarin, J.
The present revision petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has been preferred by the defendant-petitioner challenging the order dated 06.03.2018 whereby an application filed by him under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC read with Section 151 CPC for amendment of the written statement has been dismissed.
2. The brief facts relevant to the present lis are that the plaintiff-respondents filed a suit for recovery of Rs.39,70,000/- along with interest against the defendant-petitioner and another. It was averred that the plaintiff-respondents had been selling their agricultural produce to the defendants who were commission agents and the parties had known each other for some time. In November 2010 the plaintiff-respondents obtained a loan of Rs.50,00,000/- from the Oriental Bank of Commerce for which the
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
