Back
AMAN CHAUDHARY
Ram Niwas – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition filed for bail under ndps act. (Para 1) |
| 2. claims of false implication and custody duration. (Para 2) |
| 3. opposition based on recovery amount; lacks strong counter. (Para 4) |
| 4. long custody allows bail despite commercial quantity. (Para 6) |
| 5. bail granted; conditions set for petitioner. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 6. conditions and limitations clarified for bail order. (Para 9 , 10) |
Judgment
Mr. Aman Chaudhary , J.
The present petition has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for the grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.774 dated 24.12.2021, registered under Section 20 /61/85 of the NDPS Act, at Police Station Narnaund, District Hisar.
2. Learned counsel contends that the petitioner is in custody for the last 1 year and 6 months. He has been falsely implicated in the present case as the alleged recovery of 1 kg and 466 grams of Sulpha (Cannabis) has been foisted on him. Similarly placed co-accused-Ram from whom 1 kg and 008 grams of Sulpha (Cannabis) was recovered, has already been enlarged on bail by this Court vide order dated 22.02.2023, Annexure P-2 having custody of 1 year and 2 months. The mandatory provision of Section 50 of the NDPS Act was not compl
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
