SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(P&H) 1849

AMAN CHAUDHARY
Harmeet Kaur – Appellant
Versus
Vijay Kumar – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Parties : Mr. Mandeep Singh Sachdev

Table of Content
1. filing of petition under section 482 cr.p.c. (Para 1)
2. condition imposed for bail must not be onerous. (Para 2)
3. review procedures involve file perusal. (Para 3)
4. non-payment impacts suspension of sentence. (Para 4 , 9)
5. appellate court may order payment pending appeal. (Para 5)
6. interpretation of section 148 of the ni act. (Para 6 , 8 , 11 , 12 , 14)
7. supreme court’s views on compliance of conditions. (Para 10 , 13)
8. amendment serves justice for cheque transaction integrity. (Para 15)
9. application for dismissal due to lack of merit. (Para 16)

Judgment

Mr. Aman Chaudhary, J.

The present petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of order dated 24.02.2023, Annexure P-1 passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Amritsar in case bearing CRA-59-2023 titled as ‘Harmeet Kaur vs. Vijay Kumar’, whereby a condition was imposed on the petitioner to pay 20% of compensation amount to the complainant-respondent.

2. Learned counsel submits that a condition for the grant of bail cannot be made onerous for the petitioner. The appellate Court has committed an error as no reason has been assigned for imposing a condition while granting the suspension of sentenc

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top