Judgment

Mrs. Manjari Nehru Kaul, J.

The petitioner is impugning the order dated 20.03.2019 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Faridabad vide which revision petition preferred by the respondent-complainant against the dismissal of his application under Section 311 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short, ‘the Cr.P.C.’) was allowed and the latter was allowed to examine three witnesses by way of additional evidence in CIS No.NACT/5317/2015.

2. Brief facts necessary for the adjudication of this case are that the complaint in question was filed against the petitioner-accused (hereinafter referred to as ‘accused’) on the allegations that 7/8 years ago, the accused had gotten acquainted with the respondent-complainant (hereinafter referred to as ‘complainant’) since the latter was his counsel in a case. Thereafter, the accused and the complainant developed friendly relations with each other. The accus