Back
AMAN CHAUDHARY
Amarjit Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. quashing of insecticide complaint based on authorization. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. responsibility of dealers in misbranding cases. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. relevant statutory provisions from insecticides act. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 4. court’s interpretation of sealing conditions and liability. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 5. clarification on prosecution under insecticides act. (Para 15 , 16) |
| 6. final ruling to quash the prosecution against petitioners. (Para 18 , 19) |
Judgment
Mr. Aman Chaudhary, J.
This common order shall dispose of the above-mentioned petitions, as they arise out of the same complaint, whereby the petitioners have sought quashing of the Complaint Case No.211 dated 29.11.2012, Annexure P-1 registered under Section 3(k) (i), 17, 18, 29 and 33 of the Insecticide Act, 1968 read with Rule 27(5) of Insecticide Rules, 1971 titled as ‘ State Vs. M/s Grewal Sidhu Khetiwari Sewa Center and others ’ and summoning order dated 29.11.2012, Annexure P-2 alongwith all consequential proceedings arising therefrom.
2. Learned counsel submits that Petitioner No.2- M/s Grewal Sidhu Khetiwari Sewa Center in CRM-M-2441-2017 is an authorized dealer of M/s Saraswati Agro Chemical (India) Pvt
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
