RAJBIR SEHRAWAT
Parambir Singh @ Nanak – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent
Judgment
Mr. Rajbir Sehrawat, J.
The present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C for grant of bail pending trial in case FIR No.70 dated 11.07.2023 registered under Sections 379-B, 34 IPC and Section 25 of the ARMS ACT , 1959 ( Section 109 IPC, added later on) at Police Station Sadar Gurdaspur, District Gurdaspur.
2. The custody certificate filed by the learned counsel for the State, is taken on record.
3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the case against the petitioner is totally concocted. The petitioner is not involved in the crime as alleged against him. Even as per the story of the prosecution the only allegation against the petitioner is that the car, which was snatched from the complainant, was found outside the house of the petitioner when one of the co-accused, who had snatched the said car, was seen with him. Therefore, the petitioner is not even alleged to be a participant in the process of snatching from the complainant. Another allegation against the petitioner is that some illegal arm and ammunition was recovered from his house. However, that recovery is totally implanted because the police are having ill-will
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.