SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(P&H) 1594

RAJBIR SEHRAWAT
Parambir Singh @ Nanak – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Parties : Mr. Gagandeep Singh Simble, Mr. Jaspal Singh Guru AAG, Punjab

Judgment

Mr. Rajbir Sehrawat, J.

The present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C for grant of bail pending trial in case FIR No.70 dated 11.07.2023 registered under Sections 379-B, 34 IPC and Section 25 of the ARMS ACT , 1959 ( Section 109 IPC, added later on) at Police Station Sadar Gurdaspur, District Gurdaspur.

2. The custody certificate filed by the learned counsel for the State, is taken on record.

3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the case against the petitioner is totally concocted. The petitioner is not involved in the crime as alleged against him. Even as per the story of the prosecution the only allegation against the petitioner is that the car, which was snatched from the complainant, was found outside the house of the petitioner when one of the co-accused, who had snatched the said car, was seen with him. Therefore, the petitioner is not even alleged to be a participant in the process of snatching from the complainant. Another allegation against the petitioner is that some illegal arm and ammunition was recovered from his house. However, that recovery is totally implanted because the police are having ill-will

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top