SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(P&H) 1591

HARPREET SINGH BRAR
Manoj – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Parties : Mrs. Sushma Suman, Ms. Sharmila Sharma, Mr. Manish Dadwal AAG, Haryana

Judgment

Mr. Harpreet Singh Brar, J.

By this order, three appeals, details of which have been given in the head note, are being disposed of, as they have been preferred against a common judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 04.07.2017 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Sonipat whereby the appellants herein have been held guilty for commission of offence under Sections 328 , 392 read with Section 34 IPC in FIR No.288 dated 25.05.2015 registered under Sections 323 , 328, 392 IPC at Police Station City, Sonipat and sentenced to undergo following sentence:-

(i)

Dharmender

Section 328 read with Section 34 IPC

Imprisonment for a period of five years along with fine of Rs. 5,000/-

(ii)

Dheeraj @ Dheere

In default of payment of fine, convict shall undergo further imprisonment for six months

(ii)

Manoj

Section 392 read with Section 34 IPC

Rigorous imprisonment for a period of five years along with fine of Rs. 5,000/-. In default of payment of fine, convict shall undergo further rigorous imprisonment for six months

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

2. Brief facts of the prosecution case are that on 25.05.2015, an application was presen

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top