SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(P&H) 1551

JASJIT SINGH BEDI
Harinder Singh – Appellant
Versus
Rajinder Singh – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Parties : Mr. B.P.S. Virk, Mr. Pushpinder Kaushal

Judgment

Mr. Jasjit Singh Bedi, J.:- The present revision petition has been preferred against the order dated 23.03.2022 passed by the Sessions Judge, SAS Nagar, Mohali.

2. The brief facts of the case are that a criminal complaint came to be instituted at the instance of Rajinder Singh against Harsant Mohan Kaur wife of Harinder Singh and Harinder Singh (petitioner) son of Hardyal Singh under Sections 420, 406, 465, 466, 467, 471 and 120-B IPC. A copy of the complaint is attached as Annexure P-1 to the petition.

3. The said complaint came to be dismissed for non-appearance of the complainant on 09.12.2021, with the following order was passed:-

“None has appeared for complainant, despite calling case several time. No useful purpose would be served by keeping the present complaint alive when complainant is not interested in pursuing the present complaint. As such, present complaint is dismissed in default for non-appearance of the complainant. File be consigned to the Judicial Record Room”.

4. The respondent/complainant Rajinder Singh filed a revision petition against the order dated 09.12.2021. Vide order dated 23.02.2022, the Sessions Judge, SAS Nagar (Mohali) without issuing proce

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top