JASJIT SINGH BEDI
Harinder Singh – Appellant
Versus
Rajinder Singh – Respondent
Judgment
Mr. Jasjit Singh Bedi, J.:- The present revision petition has been preferred against the order dated 23.03.2022 passed by the Sessions Judge, SAS Nagar, Mohali.
2. The brief facts of the case are that a criminal complaint came to be instituted at the instance of Rajinder Singh against Harsant Mohan Kaur wife of Harinder Singh and Harinder Singh (petitioner) son of Hardyal Singh under Sections 420, 406, 465, 466, 467, 471 and 120-B IPC. A copy of the complaint is attached as Annexure P-1 to the petition.
3. The said complaint came to be dismissed for non-appearance of the complainant on 09.12.2021, with the following order was passed:-
“None has appeared for complainant, despite calling case several time. No useful purpose would be served by keeping the present complaint alive when complainant is not interested in pursuing the present complaint. As such, present complaint is dismissed in default for non-appearance of the complainant. File be consigned to the Judicial Record Room”.
4. The respondent/complainant Rajinder Singh filed a revision petition against the order dated 09.12.2021. Vide order dated 23.02.2022, the Sessions Judge, SAS Nagar (Mohali) without issuing proce
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.