SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(P&H) 1585

SANJAY VASHISTH
Amarjit Kaur – Appellant
Versus
Manjit Singh (now deceased) through LRs – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Parties : Mr. Rajinder Singh Rangpuri

Table of Content
1. disputed ownerships and wills in property succession (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 6 , 9)
2. court's reasoning upheld the lower courts' decisions (Para 7 , 10)
3. legal heirs are defined under natural succession rules in property disputes (Para 8)

Judgment

Mr. Sanjay Vashisth, J.

Present Regular Second Appeal (RSA) has been filed by defendants No.1 to 3 (appellants herein), against the concurrent finding of decreetal of suit in favour of the deceased plaintiff – Manjit Singh (respondent herein).

2. Brief facts, necessary for adjudication of the case are that plaintiff filed a suit for seeking decree of declaration to the effect that plaintiff and defendants No.4 & 5 are owners of land measuring 41 Kanals 5 Marlas ¼ share of 164 Kanals - 16 Marlas in equal shares and defendant No.1 to 3 are owners of land measuring 13 Kanals – 15 Marlas 1/16th share of land measuring 164 Kanals – 16 Kanals comprised in Khewat No.25, Khatoni No.53, Rect. No. 89, Killa No. 2(8-0), 3(8-0), 8(4-2), 9(8-0), 10(8-0), 11(8-0), 11(8-0), 20(3-13), 12(4-0), 1(8-0), Rect. No.88 Killa No. 13 (4-2), 14(8-0), 17(8-0), 19(3-18), 21/2 (3-2), 22(8-0), 23(7-8), 5(8-16), 6(8-0), 7(5-19), 15(8-0), 16(7-19), 18(7-8),

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top