SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(P&H) 1680

JASGURPREET SINGH PURI
Ashok Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Parties : Mr. Ankit Bishnoi, Mr. G.S. Sidhu AAG, Punjab

Table of Content
1. eligibility for bail due to custody duration. (Para 1 , 2)
2. arguments regarding the petitioner’s innocence and trial delay. (Para 3 , 4)
3. court’s analysis of delays violating article 21. (Para 6 , 10 , 11)
4. legal principles on detention and bail. (Para 7 , 8 , 9)
5. final ruling on bail granted. (Para 12 , 13)

Judgment

Mr. Jasgurpreet Singh Puri, J . :- The present is a second petition filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case bearing FIR No.160 dated 07.10.2021, under Section 15 of the NDPS Act, 1985, registered at Police Station Vairo Ke, District Fazilka.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is in custody from 07.10.2021, which is 2 years and 11 days and in the present case, the allegations against the petitioner and the other four co-accused were that they were coming in a car from Rajasthan and they were apprehended on the basis of a secret information received by the police and the alleged recovery from the car of the petitioner in which he was sitting on the seat of the conductor was 62 kgs. of Poppy Husk and the commercial quantity as defined in the NDPS A

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top