SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(P&H) 1700

HARPREET SINGH BRAR
Ashok Kumar Monga – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Parties : Mr. Mandeep S. Sachdev, Mr. Navreet K. Barnala AAG, Punjab, Mr. Sankalp Sagar

Judgment

Mr. Harpreet Singh Brar, J.

The present petition is preferred against the impugned order dated 18.11.2015 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Jalandhar vide which application filed by the petitioners under Section 391 Cr.P.C. to adduce additional evidence in Criminal Appeal bearing No. 29883 of 2013 titled as ‘Ashok Kumar Monga & Anr v. State of Punjab’ was dismissed.

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

2. The facts, briefly, are that FIR No. 456 dated 12.12.2003 under Section 420, 120-B IPC was registered against the petitioners at Police Station Division No. 6, Jalandhar on written complaint moved by respondent No. 2 and Jaskirat Singh to Senior Superintendent of Police, Jalandhar. It was alleged that property measuring 6 marla, situated at Cool Road, Jalandhar, was purchased by respondent No.2-Harpreet Singh, Jaskirat Singh and petitioner No. 2-Vijay Kumar jointly. However, the sale deed was executed only in the name of petitioner No. 2. Thereafter, written agreement dated 14.01.1992 were drawn, stating the interests of the complainants and the same was duly signed by petitioner No.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top