SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(P&H) 267

JAGMOHAN BANSAL
Joginder Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Parties : Mr. K.G. Chaudhry, Ms. Sakshi Singh, Mr. Pawan Kumar DAG, Punjab

Judgment

Mr. Jagmohan Bansal, J.

By this common order CWP-3009-2019 and CWP-3013-2019 are disposed of since issue involved in both the petitions and prayer sought are common. With the consent of parties and for the sake of brevity, facts are borrowed from CWP-3013-2019.

2. The petitioner through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is seeking setting aside of:-

i. Order dated 26.07.2013 (Annexure P-1) whereby petitioner has been dismissed from service;

ii. Order dated 26.04.2016 (Annexure P-2) whereby appeal filed by the petitioner has been dismissed;

iii. Order dated 26.09.2016 (Annexure P-3), 30.05.2017 (Annexure P-4) and 31.07.2018 (Annexure P-5) whereby review petition have been dismissed by appellant/revisionary authorities.

3. The petitioner joined Punjab Police as Constable in 1989 and he was subsequently promoted as Head Constable. An FIR No.160 dated 29.10.2012, under Sections 21, 22, 61 and 85 of NDPS Act, 1985 at Police Station Kotwali, Kapurthala came to be registered against various persons including petitioner. A Naka was laid down by Inspector Naresh Kumar, SHO Police Station Kotwali, Kapurthala alongwith other police officials at Nawanpind G

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top