SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(P&H) 141

VIKAS BAHL
Punjab Wakf Board – Appellant
Versus
Chanan Singh – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Parties : Mr. J.S. Bhatia, Mr. Gurbachan Singh Bhatia, Mr. Atul Jain

Judgment

Mr. Vikas Bahl, J.

Present appeal has been filed by the plaintiff/Punjab Wakf Board (hereinafter referred to as “the plaintiff-Board) against the judgment of the trial Court dated 22.08.1990, vide which the suit filed by the plaintiff-Board for possession of agricultural land situated in the revenue estate of village Kutbewal, Tehsil Sultanpur Lodhi H.8 No.56 vide jamabandi 1982-83 Khewat No.147, Khatoni No.255, Khasra Nos.8//14/8-8, 15/8-8 total 16 kanals, has been dismissed. Challenge is also to the judgment dated 04.09.1992, vide which the appeal filed by the plaintiff-Board against the said judgment has been decided by rejecting the plaint filed on behalf of the plaintiff-Board under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC.

2. Brief facts of the case are that the plaintiff-Board had filed a suit for possession on the plea that the plaintiff-Board was the exclusive owner of the suit land and the respondent-defendant/Chanan Singh (hereinafter referred to as “the respondent-defendant”) had forcibly occupied the suit land belonging to the plaintiff-Board for the last eight years and the possession of the respondent-defendant was that of a trespasser and thus, the plaintiff-Board was entitled to

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top