SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(MP) 255

PRANAY VERMA
Ganpatlal – Appellant
Versus
Ganga Bai – Respondent


Advocates:
A. K. Sethi with Harish Joshi for appellant;
V. K. Jain for respondents.

JUDGMENT

1. This appeal under section 100 of the CPC has been preferred by plaintiff against the judgment and decree dated 1.2.2002 passed in Regular Civil Appeal No.26-A/2000 by the First Additional District Judge, Mandsaur affirming the judgment and decree dated 10.3.2000 passed in Civil Suit No. 70-A/1996 by the IIIrd Civil Judge, Class-I, Mandsaur, whereby his claim for declaration was dismissed.

2. The facts of the case in brief are that the plaintiff instituted an action before the trial Court submitting that he is the owner of the suit land bearing Survey No.79, Gram Kityani, Tehsil and District Mandsaur having purchased the same from its previous owner Prakash Chandra by registered sale deed dated 14.7.1992. The defendants 1 and 2 do not have any concern with the suit land yet are contending that they have purchased the same from defendant No.3 and shall take possession of the same. Relief was claimed for declaration of his title to the suit land and for permanent injunction restraining the defendants from interfering with his possession over the suit land and from alienating the same.

3. The defendants 1 and 2 contested the plaintiff’s claim by filing their written stateme

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top