SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(P&H) 133

VIKAS BAHL
Balwinder Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant : Ms. Neha Sonawane, Mr. Sushil Saini

Judgment

Mr. Vikas Bahl, J.

This order will dispose of the above-said four writ petitions as common questions of facts and issues of law arise in the said writ petitions.

2. Separate replies filed on behalf of respondents No.1 to 4 in each of the cases are taken on record. Copies thereof have been supplied to learned counsel for the petitioners.

3. Primary prayer in the said four writ petitions is for setting aside the speaking orders passed by respondent No.1 and also the inquiry proceedings and the charge-sheets issued by respondent No.1, on the ground of the same being barred under Rule 2.2(b) of the Punjab Civil Services Rules, Volume-II (hereinafter referred as “the Rules”), inasmuch as, the same have been issued after retirement of the petitioners, for an event which had taken place more than four years prior to the initiation of the disciplinary proceedings i.e. issuance of charge-sheet.

4. On 10.01.2024, this Court was pleased to pass similar orders in the above-said writ petitions. The order passed in CWP-341-2024 is reproduced herein-below: -

“Inter alia, contends

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top