ANOOP CHITKARA
Vijender – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
ANOOP CHITKARA, J.
| FIR No. | Dated | Police Station | Sections |
| 779 | 09.12.2023 | Gharaunda, District Karnal, Haryana | 426, 420, 120-B IPC, 1860 |
1. The Petitioner incarcerated in the FIR captioned above has come up before this Court under Section 439 CrPC seeking bail.
2. In paragraph 26 of the bail petition, the accused declares that he has no criminal antecedents.
3. Petitioner’s counsel prays for bail by imposing any stringent conditions and are also voluntarily agreeable to the condition that till the conclusion of the trial, the Petitioner shall keep only one mobile number, which is mentioned in AADHAR card, if any, and within fifteen days undertakes to disconnect all other mobile numbers. The Petitioner contends that custodial interrogation and pre-trial incarceration would cause an irreversible injustice to the Petitioner and family.
4. The State opposes bail.
REASONING:
5. Prosecution case is being taken from status report dated 09.05.2024 filed by concerned DySP which reads as under:
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.